In marketing and FINANCE, surprisingly simple
models sometimes predict more accurately than more complex, sophisticated
models. Here, we address the question of when and why simple models succeed —
or fail — by framing the forecasting problem in terms of the bias–variance
dilemma. Controllable error in forecasting consists of two components, the
“bias” and the “variance”. We argue that the benefits of simplicity are often
overlooked because of a pervasive “bias bias”: the importance of the bias
component of prediction error is inflated, and the variance component of prediction
error, which reflects an oversensitivity of a model to different samples from
the same population, is neglected. Using the study of cognitive heuristics, we
discuss how to reduce variance by ignoring weights, attributes, and
dependencies between attributes, and thus make better decisions. Bias and
variance, we argue, offer a more insightful perspective on the benefits of
simplicity than Occam’'s razor.
Website: http://www.arjonline.org/business-and-management/american-research-journal-of-business-and-management/
Website: http://www.arjonline.org/business-and-management/american-research-journal-of-business-and-management/
No comments:
Post a Comment